Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC)
french

Conference Proceedings 2000
Findings On Reproductive Health Of Refugees 
And Displaced Populations

Washington DC   |   December 5-6, 2000

Co-hosted by InterAction and The Global Health Council


HIV/STDs - What Do We Know and What Can We Do?
 
 

Moderator: Brad Woodruff, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Presentations:
Meriwether 
Beatty 
Reproductive health KAP survey amongst refugees in Guinea: Findings concerning STIs & AIDS
Luke Mullany  HIV/AIDS awareness among Burmese migrant factory workers along the Thai/Burma border, Tak Province, July 2000
Nipaporn Intong    Increased condom practice in the refugee population, Nu Po camp in Thailand

 
Reproductive health KAP survey amongst refugees in Guinea: Findings concerning STIs and AIDS

Abstract revision date: December 5-6, 2000

Authors Anna v. Roenne, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ)
Sarah Kollie, Reproductive Health Group
 
Presenter  Meriwether Beatty, JSI Research and Training Institute
 
Background  The Reproductive Health Group (RHG) is a refugee NGO providing RH services for Sierra Leonean and Liberian refugees in Guinea since 1995.
 
Purpose of study 
or program 
RHG conducted a survey amongst a representative sample of Sierra Leonean and Liberian refugees living in camps in Guinea's Forest Region to explore their knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to family planning, STIs and AIDS and antenatal and delivery services. This paper presents the findings in relation to STIs and AIDS.
 
Data collection
methods
A cluster sample of refugees of reproductive age (15-49 years) was interviewed in their homes, using a 14-page questionnaire developed on the basis of validated questionnaires. 895 valid observations resulted, and univariate and bivariate statistical analyses were performed.
 
Study or 
program findings
Most respondents had heard about these reproductive health problems (STIs: 91%, AIDS: 88%). They knew that faithfulness (93% for STIs, 96% for AIDS) and condom use (92% for STIs, 93% for AIDS), as well as the use of clean needles for injections (94%) are effective ways of preventing transmission. At the same time, various misconceptions were prevalent, including a belief in HIV transmission through mosquito bites (54%) or public toilets (44%), as well as concerns that touching (26%) or sharing food (30%) with people with AIDS might cause infection.
     Health facilitators, i.e. refugee women trained and supervised by RHG, were named as the most important source of information about STIs/AIDS (56%) and their users were significantly better informed about these health problems than respondents using other sources of information.
     26.7% of refugees stated that they had suffered genital discharge and/or genital ulcers during the past 12 months. The majority (78%) had sought advice at a health facility, yet even more (82%) had bought medication at private pharmacies, highlighting the chronic lack of STI drugs at health facilities.
     Gender patterns emerged in relation to reported changes in sexual behaviour during STI episodes or in response to the AIDS threat. Although women are equally well informed about STIs, better informed about AIDS and see themselves at greater risk to 'catch AIDS,' they are less likely than men to report changes in their sexual behaviour. It is hypothesized that women's lack of control over their sexuality prevents them from acting upon their knowledge. 
 
Conclusions
and program
implications
Program implications include focused IEC messages to combat misconceptions about STIs and AIDS, highlighting the alarming STI prevalence and the chronic lack of the necessary drugs as well as the need to develop gender-specific interventions that allow women to protect themselves from STIs/AIDS.
 
For further 
information
Sarah Kollie, RHG, c/o UNHCR, Monrovia, Liberia
Anna v. Roenne: gtz-guinea@gn.gtz.de

HIV/AIDS awareness among Burmese migrant factory workers along the Thai/Burma border, Tak Province, July 2000

Abstract revision date: December 5-6, 2000

Authors Cynthia Maung, Director, Mae Tao Clinic, Mae Sot, Thailand
Luke Mullany, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health
Aung Tun, Health Program Director, National Health and Education Committee (NHEC)
Po Thaw Dah, Burma Medical Association (BMA)
 
Presenter Luke Mullany
 
Background Over 1 million Burmese migrant workers currently live along the Thai/Burma border having fled oppression in Burma. Thousands find work in factories, shops, farms, construction projects and restaurants, where they are vulnerable to exploitation through low wages and harsh working conditions. Their legal, social and economic situation prevents access to basic social services, including health care and education, and has led to high-risk sexual and social behavior.
 
Purpose of 
study or program 
Little information has been systematically gathered on either the prevalence of HIV virus infection or the level of knowledge within this sub-population concerning risk factors, prevention and/or transmission of HIV. The Burma Medical Association (BMA) and National Health and Education Council (NHEC) designed an HIV/AIDS education pilot project outside the Mae Sot municipal area (Tak Province, Thailand) in collaboration with Thai Public Health officials.
 
Data collection
methods
A survey was carried out in 8 factories to provide an outline of general and specific HIV/AIDS knowledge levels among migrant workers and to assist in the design and implementation of the peer-education training curriculum. Workers were questioned about their knowledge of prevention, transmission and risk factors of HIV infection. The sampling of interviewees may not have been completely random as factory owners excluded the HIV/AIDS working group from the selection process. 
 
Study or 
program findings
Responses were grouped into prevention, transmission and risk categories, and the percentage answered correctly in each category was recorded for all participants. Men consistently scored higher than women in each category, with significant gender differences in the prevention and transmission questions. Only 26.5% of respondents knew that they needed to have their blood tested to learn their HIV status. 15% of females reported ever seeing a condom and only 41% of the women understood that contraceptive pills do not prevent infection. Men were eight times more likely than women to report using a condom at least once (12.7% vs 1.7%, p<.00001). 
 
Conclusions
and program
implications
Caution must be used when interpreting these results because of the sensitivity of the questions and the relative unfamiliarity of the interviewees in being questioned by their peers. However, the results remain important as virtually zero access has been extended to persons trying to document health status or education in migrant worker factories. The survey reveals a significant lack of knowledge about HIV and suggests the need for an extensive broad-based educational curriculum, with messages specifically tailored to the sexes. Varying levels of knowledge indicate areas that need to be stressed during the training of peer-educators.
 
For further 
information
Luke Mullany, 904 St. Paul St. 1B, Baltimore, MD  21202  USA 
Telephone 410-659-9894
Email  mullany@jhsph.edu
 

Increased condom practice in the refugee population, Nu Po camp in Thailand

Abstract revision date: December 5-6, 2000

Authors Nipaporn Intong, American Refugee Committee, Thailand
 
Presenter Nipaporn Intong
 
Background Nu Po camp is a Karen refugee camp on the Thai-Burma border with about 8,200 refugees. The refugees are those who fled to Thailand from the Burmese army offense in their villages in 1997. The reproductive age group (15-45 years) comprises 46% of the population. Condom practice among this group is a priority given the HIV/AIDS situation in Thailand, Burma and the refugee camps. The attitudes of the refugees toward condom use, the denial of HIV/AIDS infection in the camp and the opposition of the camp committee on condom education were program challenges. To overcome these challenges, a variety of theoretical perspectives in health education were drawn upon to guide the program's condom promotion activities.
 
Purpose of study 
or program
The purposes of this program were to increase condom practice and to change attitudes among refugees in the camp in preventing HIV/AIDS transmission.
 
Data collection
methods
Information was gathered to plan and conduct condom promotion activities. Personal interviews, survey, focus group, program document review and community observations were conducted during the pre-assessment. A surveillance system was developed to record/collect condom distribution by area, gender and marital status. New and old users were also recorded. Data were used to monitor and evaluate program implementation.
 
Study or program 
findings
The results of the pre-assessment showed that refugees would accept condoms as a choice of contraceptive method. Condoms were more acceptable when distributed to married couples and for family planning purposes. Talking about condoms to prevent HIV/AIDS infection caused a negative reaction and was embarrassing because of the conservative culture. Many women believed strongly that their husbands were faithful and honest; they did not realize that some of the men were practicing high-risk behaviors such as drug and alcohol abuse and experimental sex. Some refugees did not understand that condoms could protect them from HIV/AIDS/STDs, besides preventing unwanted births. Some understood the health benefits, but denied using condoms because of the associated stigma. The survey found only 33 out of 1,214 couples (7.7%) who used condoms. The refugees felt comfortable talking about and asking for condoms from the community health educator (CHE) in their sections. The use of condoms increased from 0 to 39 people in the year 1999, according to family planning service records. In addition, refugees who stopped using pills and DepoProvera started using condoms.
 
Conclusions and 
program implications 
Seven activities were undertaken: (1) staff training, (2) community condom distribution, (3) group discussion about condom practice, (4) community health education and promotion, (5) community health meetings to raise awareness of condom practice, (6) family planning counseling and (7) epidemiological surveillance. Post-implementation results showed some changes. Approximately 398 refugees (10.6%) were using condoms and more than 7,000 condoms had been distributed from February 1999 to August 2000. The percentage of persons using condoms increased by about 10% from the beginning of the implementation. Refugees now are more familiar with condoms and openly talk about them. Any refugee who needs condoms can easily get them from community health education workers providing culturally sensitive services in every section of the camp. 
 
For further 
information
Ms. Nipaporn Intong, American Refugee Committee, P.O. Box 7, Umphang Tak 63170 Thailand
Telephone and Fax   6655 561-177
Email: arcumpha@loxinfo.co.th
 

 

 Next: Expanding Our Base - New Audiences, New Services, New Channels

Back to Contents