Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC)
french

Conference Proceedings 2000
Findings On Reproductive Health Of Refugees 
And Displaced Populations

Washington DC   |   December 5-6, 2000

Co-hosted by InterAction and The Global Health Council


Using Participatory Data Collection Methods to Plan Reproductive Health Programs
 
 

Moderator: Beverly Tucker, Family Health International
Presentations:
Zeinab Abdi Ahmed SGBV as viewed by refugees in Kenya: Learning about sensitive RH issues and developing responses using participatory assessment techniques
Tracey Lee NORPLANT® for Karen refugees on the Thai-Burmese border
Aftab Tariq 
Ihsan 
Participatory rapid appraisal (PRA) of the reproductive health needs of Afghan refugees in Pakistan
 

 
SGBV as viewed by refugees in Kenya: Learning about sensitive RH issues and developing responses using participatory assessment techniques

Abstract revision date: December 5-6, 2000

Authors Susan M. Igras, CARE-USA Health Unit
Zeinab Abdi Ahmed, CARE-Kenya Refugee Assistance Program
 
Presenter  Zeinab Abdi Ahmed
 
Background  Sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) in the Dadaab refugee camps in northern Kenya has been an issue since refugees began arriving from Somalia. In response, an inter-agency SGBV program has existed in Dadaab since the early 1990s. A 1999 survey indicated that 28% of women in the camps had been sexually aggressed since becoming refugees. The program was viewed as needing to respond better.
 
Purpose of study 
or program 
CARE's RH for Refugees Initiative staff facilitated a multi-agency assessment of SGBV in late 1998 that focused on substantive discussions with refugee groups, using participatory exercises to focus discussions.
 
Data collection
methods
The 1995 UNHCR publication, Sexual Violence Against Refugees: Guidelines on Prevention and Response, guided the development of question guides for use at the community level to explore the problem and its causes, and to solicit solutions to reduce violence. Concurrently, a systems analysis of the actual SGBV reporting, treatment and support systems was conducted.
 
Study or 
program findings
Refugees provided their definitions of violence and its consequences. They identified areas where they felt vulnerable to assault within the camps. They spoke of individual and community coping mechanisms to prevent violence and support survivors of violence. When asked about solutions, ideas emerged: forming vigilance groups to patrol the camps at night, cleaning up bushes inside camps that could hide perpetrators, asking UNHCR and the police to establish 'safe corridors' for firewood collection, and expanding economic opportunities for women so they would not need to collect firewood or enter into coercive sexual relationships. The systems review indicated that greater sensitivity was needed for rape survivors as they maneuvered numerous and at times uncoordinated services.
 
Conclusions
and program
implications
Suggestions from the assessment resulted in improvements in the SGBV program, including better inter-agency coordination of reporting, treatment and support services, and refugee outreach activities to recognize trauma, support survivors of violence, and prevent violence from occurring in the first place. CARE, Médecins sans Frontières/Belgium and the National Council of Churches of Kenya plan to expand the program further to address new forms of violence (intimate partner violence and coercion) and to experiment with women's drop-in centers to bring services closer to the refugee communities and expand RH and social services to women in the camps.
     The use of participatory assessment techniques provides an appropriate way to get input on sensitive issues and plays a critical role in identifying issues and better supporting survivors and communities faced with violence. Concurrent systems analysis can validate these issues and help define what solutions are feasible given available resources. 
 
For further 
information
Zeinab Abdi Ahmed, Vulnerable Women & Children's Supervisor, Refugee Assistance Project, Dadaab, CARE Kenya, PO Box 43864, Nairobi, Kenya.
Telephone : 254-131-2060
Fax:  254-131-3242
Email: zeddie@ddb.care.or.ke

NORPLANT  for Karen refugees on the Thai-Burmese border
Abstract revision date: December 5-6, 2000
Authors T. Lee, N. Lay Hter, D. D. Cho, Eh Paw, R. McGready, F. Nosten; Shoklo Malaria Research Unit 
 
Presenter Tracey Lee
 
Background The use of long-term, reversible contraceptives is infrequently reported in displaced populations. In 1996, Norplant , a sub-dermal implant with contraceptive duration of five years, was offered free of charge within a family planning program.  The program served a stable population of 30,000 Karen displaced persons in Maela camp on the western border of Thailand. Norplant has been used in Thailand since 1987 but is unavailable in Burma. The proportion of women who chose the method was 6%.
 
Purpose of 
study or program
To describe use of Norplant , a long-term contraceptive, by a refugee population.
 
Data collection
methods
Between January 1997 and March 1999, 105 consenting Norplant  users were followed every three months in order to establish rates of continuation and side effects. At least six months after insertion, women were questioned regarding reasons for choosing the method and plans for removal in the event of returning to Burma. A further 33 known Norplant  users who did not participate in the routine follow-up and who consented to interview were included for comparison.
 
Study or 
program findings
70% (n = 74) of women were able to be followed. The remainder either went to work, moved or were lost to follow-up (n = 31). One third (n = 24) of women requested to have the implants removed. The most commonly cited reasons for requesting removal were pain or infection at the insertion site or desire for pregnancy. 17% (4/24) of removal requests were attributed to bleeding irregularities. Headache and dizziness were the most frequently reported side effects. The median (range) number of weeks before removal was 35 (1-135).
 
Conclusions
and program
implications
The study reports Norplant  usage by refugees in stable circumstances, a novel report. While requiring extensive training for providers and client counseling, it expanded contraceptive choice for this displaced population.
 
For further 
information
Tracey Lee, Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, PO Box 46, Mae Sot, Thailand 63110
Email: shoklo@cscoms.com

Participatory rapid appraisal (PRA) of the reproductive health needs of Afghan refugees in Pakistan
Abstract revision date: December 5-6, 2000
Authors Ariel Ahart, Save the Children Consultant
 
Presenter Aftab Tariq Ihsan, Save the Children Federation, Pakistan
 
Background Save the Children/United States (SC/US) provides assistance to 105,000 Afghan refugees in the Haripur District of Pakistan through meeting basic health needs: child health care, tuberculosis and malaria control programs, basic curative services and reproductive health programs including Maternal and Newborn Care and family planning.
 
Purpose of study 
or program
In April 1997, SC/US initiated a study on the RH needs of Afghan refugees. The main purposes of the study were to: 1) field test the RHR Consortium's needs assessment guide and 2) ascertain the community's knowledge, beliefs and practices related to critical RH areas.
 
Data collection
methods
SC/US used the Participatory Rapid Appraisal (PRA) technique to gather information through a multidisciplinary team. A total of 1,370 Afghan Refugees participated (920 women, 450 men). PRA tools included: direct observation, secondary sources, pair-wise ranking, causal flow, lifeline analysis and livelihood analysis diagrams. The team secured community support before embarking on the survey and cross-checked results with refugees before writing the final report.
 
Study or program 
findings
  • Married Afghan women typically reported 8 to 11 pregnancies over the course of their reproductive lives.
  • Refugees expressed the desire to space their children in order to protect the mother's health and/or because they could not afford additional children.
  • Knowledge about STDs and HIV/AIDS was extremely poor. Men who had sex with multiple partners and/or traveled outside the camp were at greatest risk of contracting and transmitting STDs and HIV.
  • A number of health problems identified amongst women pointed to a high incidence of RTIs and genital prolapse.
  • The incidence of domestic violence appears to be high. Husbands were identified as the primary perpetrators. However, the role of other family members deserves further attention.
  • Early marriage is common and increases the risk of domestic violence. 
  • Major weaknesses were identified in the referral system.
  • Girls and boys had limited knowledge about puberty, their bodies, and reproductive health.
Conclusions and 
program implications 
Through PRA, it is possible to openly discuss RH topics within a conservative Islamic community. A number of program implications were identified: the need to make contraceptives more readily available; greater education on critical areas of RH as well as RTIs, STDs and HIV/AIDS; increased access to emergency obstetric services; education and outreach to primary RH decision makers; and additional training of staff. The issue of domestic violence emerged as one of the most sensitive and most difficult topics to address, one which must acknowledge the cycle of violence and the role of different family members.
 
For further 
information
Dr. Aftab Tariq Ihsan, Regional Health Director, Save the Children Federation, 
P.O . Box  1952, Islamabad, Pakistan
Telephone: 92-51-227-9211
Email: tihsan@savechildren.org.pk


 
 
Back to Contents